Interesting. It seems that with the resonance hypothesis, like Einstein did with Sternglass, they explore the evident possibility of collective behaviors.
I won't be surprised if some young theorist in closed room, consider some ideas from LENR, but carefully don't cite that banned domain... It may be good... anyway possible it is an artifact... 2013/5/31 Axil Axil <[email protected]> > Big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, together with the precise WMAP > cosmic baryon density, makes tight predictions for the abundances of the > lightest elements. > > > > Deuterium and 4He measurements agree well with expectations, but 7Li > observations lie a factor 3 - 4 below the BBN+WMAP prediction. This 4 - 5 > mismatch constitutes the cosmic "lithium > > problem," with disparate solutions possible. (1) Astrophysical systematics > in the observations could exist but are increasingly constrained. (2) > Nuclear physics experiments provide a wealth of well-measured cross-section > data, but 7Be destruction could be *enhanced by unknown or > poorly-measured resonances, * > > > > Physics beyond the Standard Model can alter the 7Li abundance, though D > and 4He must remain unperturbed; Physics is inventing outlandish theories > for this puzzle including decaying Super symmetric particles and > time-varying fundamental constants. > > > > Why don't they consider LENR??? Because they have a closed mind! > > > > http://sait.oat.ts.astro.it/MSAIt780307/PDF/2007MmSAI..78..476G.pdf > > > > The screening of lithium reactions are as high as 17.4 MeV. > > > > LENR is why there is a "Lithium Problem" >
