It has been apparent to me for a long time that DGT uses a different method for generation of heat than does Rossi. Both techniques appear to work.
The main question is whether or not one of the processes has a significantly long life span before internal damage makes it require maintenance. Of course the cost of manufacturing is important as well. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Vorl Bek <vorl....@antichef.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Jun 1, 2013 7:28 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:52:44 -0400 Ron Kita <chiralex.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Greeting Vortex-L > > Boring.... > http://www.lenrnews.eu/ Are you kidding? This blows Rossi out of the water. [quote] The good-news claim is that DGT can control their multi-stage dynamic process. We observed their fifth-generation apparatus being ramped up in minutes instead of taking hours or days to reach levels of heat output several times higher than equivalent energy input of electricity....All that's needed to stop the reactor from producing excess heat energy is to switch off those currents that create plasma. [/quote] No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense. This sounds like the real deal.
