Why do people keep asking to see a hydrino if we know it requires an NAE to translate to this state? Are they asking to see the gas / powder in situ? There is no reason to suspect the hydrogen will remain translated when it exits the lattice although it would be interesting to know if a dihydrino could retain some fraction of translation apart from the NAE.. this might even explain some of the Columb weakening proposed for 3 party collisions where 2 parties are represented by a dihydrino molecule or pico H2. There is also the sunburn experienced by Professor Conrads when he was exposed to Mills powder configured as a plasma lamp.. still no hydrino but an indirect measurement of the shifted spectrum photons emitted by hydrino.. this may be as close to proof as you can come if the hydrogen needs to be in the lattice to translate to this state.
http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/28/28977/1.html [snip]Critics object that such confirmations cannot be labelled "independent" because BlackLight Power was either in a consultant role or their laboratory had been used. Both has been avoided by German physics professor Johannes Conrads. The plasma researcher had a private interest in this work but the employer he had worked for for 30 years, the Jülich Research Center, feared repercussions if he engaged in experiments. He found an open ear at Bochum Ruhr University provided that no "crazy theories" were involved. But Mills plasma lamp burned. "I very well remember the sunburn I had the next day," says Thomas Wrubel who was involved in the experiment. The BlackLight Power reaction produces intense ultraviolet light. "Such an extreme ultraviolet emission is not expected," Gerrit Kroesen from the Technical University of Eindhoven comments who is currently engaged in studying the BlackLight Process himself. "You have to make very difficult mental bends to explain it." Conrads and Wrubel tried to get to the bottom of the mysterious light emission using well-founded and established methods, even modifying the experiment. For one year they worked on the experiment on and off. But they never found an explanation for the plasma because "the minimally required energy was by all the rules not available. We either have a new chemical reaction we could not nail down or it is something else strange," Wrubel looks back wondering. For the 2003 publication <http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0963-0252/12/3/312/> Mills was added as a co-author because he had supplied the reaction vessel. Wrubel does not work in research anymore. [/snip] Fran
