Hello folks, I'm scanning just a little of the cold fusion discussion the last two weeks -- I'm glad Joshua Cude is married and has to balance a life against his brisk practice to pinpointing and summarizing evidence that cold fusion claims are erroneous -- I believe him when he says, like me, he would love to see effective replicable proof for any anomaly in cold fusion research -- elusive now for 24 years, since 1989 -- I have experience with psychokinesis many time via the ancient method of throwing 3 pennies 6 times to get amazing advice from the I Ching -- I understand the many sensible skeptical critiques of this claim -- so I suspect cold fusion is another case of appearances shifting within awareness due to faith and desire -- we live and move and have our being within an inexplicable hyperinfinity...
within the fellowship of service, Rich Murray On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:28 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote: > Vorl: > You haven't a clue either... > > When it comes to LENR, there is overwhelming evidence, and most of the > people on this forum who 'appear' as TBs, have read the literature, so to > call them TBs is in error; they are basing their decision on having read > the > evidence themselves. To someone who hasn't read it, or only skimmed it, > I'm > sure we look like TBs. Like Dr. Rob Duncan said at the end of the > 60-Minutes story on CF, "Read the publications, talk to the [CF] > scientists, > visit their labs... DON'T LET OTHERS DO YOUR THINKING FOR YOU." Many here > have... have you? > > When it comes to Rossi, I see plenty of rational criticism and concern as > well in most regular contributors on this forum; I think we all have some > level of concern and are not 100% convinced. That is not the definition of > a TB. If Rossi was the lone claimant of excess heat and other anomalous > observations, then perhaps TB would be appropriate. But that is not that > case. > > So we can either sit here and bad-mouth Rossi, and think of all manner of > ways that it could be a scam (which serves no useful purpose other than > self-gratification), OR, we can assume he's onto something, which due to > much evidence outside of Rossi is reasonable, and try to help progress by > discussing reasonable concerns and possible mechanisms. There are some > experimentalists on the forum and perhaps it'll help their efforts; which > is > the more honorable use of our time? It should be obvious... > > At least this forum has a level of respect for the individual and those who > might be onto some discovery that could benefit all, and the planet. Cude > has no respect for the people on this forum, and probably in general... his > arrogance is so blatant, even you should be able to see it. > > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vorl Bek [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Over 40 messages posted by Joshua Cude posted on June 4 > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:35:47 -0500 > "OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Mr. Beaty, > > > > > > > > When I opened up my mail box this morning I was flooded with over 40 > > posted messages from Joshua Cude. And it's only 7:10 AM in the > > morning. I know of no one within the Vort Collective besides Cude that > > has displayed this amount of excessive and obsessive posting behavior. > > How many more Cude posts can we expect, today alone? > > Cude is one sane person in a nest of True Believers. He has every right to > point out the nonsense the TBs are spouting. > > Others on this list post far more often than Cude, but you have nothing to > say about them; it seems to me you just want to shut Cude up because you do > not like what he says. > > > >
