Steven, I meant that UFOs are merely a fascination or distraction for the rest of us. I am sure that psychology therapy was probably necessary for those who experienced it directly, especially the closer encounters.
Roger From: orionwo...@charter.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk? Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:54:20 -0500 >From Roger B: > No, LENR and UFOs are not in the same category. > LENR has >lots of physical evidence. The so-called> physical evidence for UFOs is very >weak if not non-existent. I disagree. They are very much in the same >category. In many cases trying to produce a LENR phenomenon has been damned >near impossible to accomplish, even by experienced LENR researchers. Granted, >lately some seem to be getting better at reproducing the LENR effect. >Unfortunately, UFO investigators have had less luck. No doubt the fact that >it's impossible to sequester UFO phenomenon within the confines of a >laboratory has something to do with the problem. ;-) UFO phenomenon happens >when it happens. The phenomenon NEVER occurs under any kind of a laboratory >condition. For some to use the premise that the evidence is weak or >non-existent because there is no official documented evidence is a blatant cop >out. They just don’t want to deal with the issue nor the potential >ramifications. See the following commissioned painting I did for an individual >who had an unexpected encounter of his own back in the mid 1980s: >http://orionworks.com/artgal/svj/MayEncounters_m.htm How does one prove it >happened. Or that it even existed. The observer certainly knows. But for the >rest of us. Ah.... he just has a vivid imagination, or he was drinking. Blah >blah blah. BTW, surely you don't think the military hasn't had a chance to >accumulate some interesting gun camera footage over the past 50 years? I bet >there is plenty of evidence. And those who have accumulated the best evidence >aren't talking. > [LENRs will help people. UFOs are just a distraction from> >worry about paying one's bills.] I disagree. I realizes you are probably >saying this in jest, but IMO UFOs are not a distraction. Many had no choice in >what it was they saw. It just happened to them – randomly so. What does that >have to do with becoming a distraction from paying the bills. > The so-called >physical evidence for UFOs are completely> out of our control. There is no >way to predict when a> UFO sighting will happen next. The physical evidence >for> LENRs is in our control, mostly. We can generally know> when LENRs are >going to happen. Indeed. But the fact is that both UFOs and LENR strike many >as unproved phenomenon. > The only thing that LENRs and UFOs have in common is >that> they are edgy, unexplained, out-of-the-mainstream. The> UFO sighting >phenomena is a legitimate arena of scientific> study, but scientists are too >gutless to try. Indeed, I agree with that conclusion. Regards,Steven Vincent >Johnsonsvjart.OrionWorks.comwww.zazzle.com/orionworkstech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex >
