Was "ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR RANDOM INDUCED STATES <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A +%5BVo%5D%3AENTANGLEMENT+THRESHOLDS+FOR+RANDOM+INDUCED+STATES%22> " but After reading Axil's citation http://phys.org/news/2013-05-einstein-spooky-action-common-large.html**** and subsequent posts this new thread occurred to me.. That the active geometry or "NAE" must be protected by entanglement. Entanglement explains how the heat is equally thermalized and vented to the heat sink without damaging the geometry and preventing hot spots. It suggests a slow warm up to load gas beyond the 20% level is necessary before the anomalous heating threshold is achieved to prevent hot spots. This rings true for so many of the experiments we have seen, both successful and failures that it should be considered a guideline for protecting the NAE from the moment the geometry is formed. Lack of entanglement could also explain why Celani's new wires arrived inert, having been heat processed without reaching entanglement they could be damage by whatever chemicals or ambient gases loaded onto his surface..not too hard to imagine a vendor using a hydrocarbon to clean the wires, which has probably been done previously but in a rush to make product they heat the wires faster or higher and the geometry went super catalytic without the aid of entanglement..and quickly self destructed.
Fran
