2013/6/10 Hamdi Ucar <[email protected]> > Comments: Appendix on electrical measurements added
Hi all, I've read the appendix, and noticed the claim about DC voltage offset being checked by PCE830 only. Reading the spec of the PCE-830 I don't know how they could measure the DC offset voltage, yet the cabling allow it (unlike current clamp which are AC). If someone here can contact the team so they precise why the DC offset voltage could be measured, or remove that comment. If DC offset cannot be seen straight from PCE830 voltage, maybe smarter analysis of the waveform could help. Non linearities of some components may help to detect DC offset in voltage or current. Maybe it can impact current clamps linearity (probably no, but...)? The model of the device plugged on the same plug should be documented in that case to estimate the maximum DC offset before destruction, or dysfunction. Or to estimate the non-linearities ... anyway, if DC cannot be ruled out easily, it won't convince the hugely-biased readers. For me, using my corporate EQ more than my engineer IQ, I'm more convinced by the fact that Rossi let the testers touch his beloved kitten. It rules out fraud in general, and only let tripple errors (Rossi's team, Proia's team, and Essen's team ) as desperate option for skeptics.
