On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
Yes a neutrino would be produced. However, as I have said often, the
electron is added after almost all the excess mass-energy has been
emitted as weak photons. Therefore, the neutrino would have very
little energy to carry away, thereby not reducing the observed
energy by a significant amount.
The electron is added as part of the fusion process, not in advance
to make a free neutron as proposed by W-L and Brillouin.
Consequently no energy has to be assembled. The energy resulting
from the fusion process is more than enough to allow the neutron to
form within the final nuclear product, not as a free neutron. The
timing makes all the difference.
Ed
On Jun 12, 2013, at 3:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:41:33
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Alain, millions of scientists have worked over the last 200 years to
define rules that are so well known they are called laws. These laws
must not be violated without a very good reason. If you want to use
the disco analogy, this disco has a very strong bouncer who will not
tolerate certain kinds of behavior. Some of us have met this bouncer
and show respect. If you do not know the bouncer, I suggest you stay
out of the disco because otherwise you will get into serious
trouble.
W-L and Brillouin have proposed behavior that violates the rules
(laws). As a result, they will be eventually thrown out of the
disco.
It's only a matter of time.
Ed
Ed, need I point out that your own theory would also produce
neutrinos?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
