Axil, Thanks, I had read their paper. I think that the collapsed dark energy/matter field(95%) is pulling a vacuum on our side(5%) of the fence, else I would have called my blog vacuummattersalot which would not sound cool. Black holes suck (entropy).
Stewart On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120906092059.htm > > *Mathematicians Offer Unified Theory of Dark Matter, Dark Energy, > Altering Einstein Field Equations.* > > There is no such thing as a vacuum. please revise your theory. > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Very possible, The broadened emissions are from the hydrino >> contribution, the hydrogen’s spatial motion has already been reduced by >> nano confinement and then longer vacuum wavelengths are suddenly suppressed >> by the local geometry. My posit is that these fractional orbits are >> negative inertial frames where spatial motion is already effectively zero >> but the quotient of V^2/C^2 is further reduced because the unit of time is >> suppressed proportional to the vacuum wavelengths. Naudt’s paper called it >> relativistic hydrogen but perhaps inverse relativistic would have been more >> appropriate because from our perspective the hydrogen in a cavity ages >> faster while hydrogen ejected from the suns corona ages slower. As in any >> relativistic frame the local observers are unaware of time dilation but >> radiation emitted from f/h at the normal frequency in a negative inertial >> frame will translate to longer wavelengths as dilation reduces and orbits >> becomes less fractional. The frequency appears lower when we observe it in >> our macro inertial frame since space time has stretched from the negative >> inertial frame where the radiation originated. That’s my story and I’m >> sticking to it :_) >> Fran >> _____________________________________________ >> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] >> *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 12:41 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Venus - high and dry - why ? >> >> >> >> As illogical as it may sound on first blush, can any electrically powered >> thermal device (looking pretty much like a tube furnace) function in such a >> way so as to convert a hot blackbody surface into a cooler (but still quite >> hot) coherent infrared interior … with superradiant resonance at 15 THz? >> >> To make it a little clearer where this suggestion is going - imagine a >> stainless steel tube sealed at both ends, so as to operate simply as a >> cavity resonator for unfocused infrared radiation (instead of operating as >> a laser emission tube). Imagine it is a version of a gas-phase optically >> pumped non-focused IR laser -- in which the gas is a hydride, perhaps KH, >> operating at partial vacuum. Here is a predecessor design. >> >> * >> http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1006553 >> *<http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1006553> >> >> The optical pumping mechanism is supplied by hotter IR radiation from a >> superabsorbent re-emitter, such as a silicon-carbide exterior tube, with >> the inner stainless tube centered with minimal contact. That >> silicon-carbide superabsorbent re-emitter tube is itself heated by a >> resistence heater at over 800 C. It remains hotter at its peak temperature >> than the interior tube at 447 C because the interior tube is >> absorbing/re-emitting predominantly at 15 THz or 20 micron radiation. >> >> Thus the net effect is that the inner superradiant tube emits extremely >> intense radiation but with a lower peak. This is similar to Randell Mills >> “emission-line broadening” but in IR. >> >> These dynamics would result in a skewed emission curve for the external >> tube as well. Emission line broadening allows massively more net energy to >> be emitted from a source at a lower effective peak temperature – compared >> to blackbody assumptions. Thus the HotCat could be even more energetic than >> imagined, based on the technique used to measure it – which assumed no line >> broadening >> >> Possible, or no? >> >> Jones >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
