"no reliable sources" of course if you dismiss all sources as unreliable just because they mention the ICCF.
* http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion * http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/08/04/the-state-of-the-cold-fusion-market/2/ * the ICCF is mentioned in the Nuclear Energy Encyclopedia published by Wiley. * http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.11/coldfusion_pr.html * http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/call-for-interdisciplinary-studies-in-cold-fusion/article1165494.ece On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > after ISCMNS, it is ICCF which is tagged for deletion > > I've made an article... > > > http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1638-ICCF-Wikipedia-article-called-for-deletion&p=5173#post5173 > > more details will be welcome... > > its starts to be ridiculous, and stinky. > > > 2013/4/19 Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> > >> > From: "Jed Rothwell" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:08:35 AM >> >> > Someone informed me that the ISCMNS article at Wikipedia is up for >> > deletion: >> > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Society_for_Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science >> > >> > I did not know there is an article on this. I consider this good >> > news. Wikipedia is a travesty. The less there is about cold fusion >> > in Wikipedia, the better. >> > >> > I wish I could persuade them to delete the articles on Cold Fusion >> > and Eugene Mallove. >> > >> > - Jed >> >> Result was delete. 3 voted for delete, 2 for merging three separate >> pages (ISCMNS,JSCMNS and a grant page), 1 comment >> I bet they tackle JSCMNS next. >> >> >
