Anapole magnetic moments inside nuclei seem to be correlated with radioactive decay with its association with parity non conservation (PCN), a weak force characterization property.
The even nucleon number susceptibility to the LENR reaction also is marked by greatly elevated magnetic anopole levels. Anapole magnetic fields are produced by monopole field magnetic generation by quark/antiquark pairs inside subatomic particles. One point that surprised me was that gluons, the strong force carriers, seem to be virtual particles that actually carry monopole field strength. This idea comes from the theory of quantum chromodynamics called the dual superconductor model. For more background on this theory see as follows: http://ccdb5fs.kek.jp/tiff/2012/1227/1227046.pdf *Non-Abelian dual superconductivity and Gluon propagators in the deep IR region for SU(3) Yang-Mills theory* In this theory of quantum chromodynamics, the dual superconductor model attempt to explain confinement of quarks in terms of an electromagnetic dual theory of superconductivity. The strong force is just a reversal of electromagnetic behavior. In an electromagnetic dual theory the roles of electric and magnetic fields are interchanged. The BCS theory of superconductivity explains superconductivity as the result of the condensation of electric charges into Cooper pairs. In a dual superconductor an analogous effect occurs through the condensation of magnetic charges (also called magnetic monopoles). In ordinary electromagnetic theory, no monopoles have been shown to exist. However, in quantum chromodynamics — the theory of color charge which explains the strong interaction between quarks — the color charges can be viewed as (non-abelian) analogues of electric charges and corresponding magnetic monopoles are known to exist. Dual superconductor models posit that condensation of these magnetic monopoles in a superconductive state explains color confinement — the phenomenon that only neutrally colored bound states are observed at low energies. Color confinement is where the LENR reaction operates. Qualitatively, confinement in dual superconductor models can be understood as a result of the dual to the Meissner effect. The Meissner effect says that a superconducting metal will try to expel magnetic field lines from its interior. If a magnetic field is forced to run through the superconductor, the electric field lines are compressed in magnetic flux tubes. In a dual superconductor the roles of magnetic and electric fields are exchanged and the Meissner effect tries to expel electric field lines. Quarks and antiquarks carry opposite color charges, and for a quark–antiquark pair 'electric' field lines run from the quark to the antiquark. In a pion, the quark–antiquark pair is immersed in a dual superconductor, and then the electric field lines get compressed to a flux tube. The energy carried to the tube is proportional to its length, and the potential energy of the quark–antiquark is proportional to their separation. The energy of colored objects gets infinite if quark/antiquark pair moves apart. A quark–antiquark will therefore always bind regardless of their separation, which explains why no unbound quarks are ever found. Dual superconductors are described by (a dual to) the Landau–Ginzburg model, which is equivalent to the Abelian Higgs model. The MIT bag model boundary conditions for gluon fields are those of the dual color superconductor. It is possible that a monopole field will disrupt the duel superconductive mechanism that keeps the nucleus and the nucleons that make it up together. How can this monopole magnetic field disrupt a nucleus? One type pion that keeps the nucleus together is made of one up quark and one down antiquark. If we can find a source of a monopole field in the Ni/H reactor, we may be able to explain transmutation of elements via disruption of the strong force. To begin with, MarkI-ZeroPoint pointed out the creation of a possible monipole field generator: the skyrmions in magnetic material as follows: http://phys.org/news/2013-05-skyrmions-ferromagnet-centrosymmetry.html *Observation of skyrmions in a ferromagnet with centrosymmetry* See his post as follows: [Vo]:Of Rabbit Holes and Rogue Waves... was "Why did Rossi prevent detailed measurement of the power input?" MarkI-ZeroPoint Fri, 24 May 2013 17:02:46 -0700 I take this opportunity to extend MarkI’s thinking as follows: This skyrmions production mechanism is supported by this observation as follows: http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v8/n5/full/nnano.2013.69.html#ref2 *Direct observation and dynamics of spontaneous skyrmion-like magnetic domains in a ferromagnet* The skyrmion-like magnetic domains appear as clusters above the Curie temperature. We found that the repeated reversal of magnetic chirality is caused by thermal fluctuation. The closely spaced clusters exhibit dynamic coupling, and the repeated magnetization reversal becomes fully synchronized with the same chirality. Quantitative analysis of such dynamics was performed by LTEM to directly determine the barrier energy for the magnetization reversal of skyrmion-like nanometer domains. This study is expected to pave the way for further investigation of the unresolved nature and dynamics of magnetic vortex-like Nano-domains. It seems like the magnetic fields in some magnetic materials like nickel will break apart into nanocluster based ring current vortexes which produce monopole fields. In nickel nanowire, vortexes of contra-rotating currents produce monopole fields down the center of the nanowire. We also saw this vortex current formation happen is single walled carbon nanotubes. But the magnetic nature of nickel and carbon are not the same. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkops.ub.uni-konstanz.de%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2Furn%3Anbn%3Ade%3Absz%3A352-182161%2FDiss_kim-June-seo.pdf%3Fsequence%3D3&ei=lVPDUZzjKM_F4AOh-4GACg&usg=AFQjCNH-WFwJncJ15OLHao6rivi5G8DzhQ&sig2=nZwPmuW0j09QVwWXw-n-Mw&bvm=bv.48175248,d.dmg *Magnetization Dynamics in a Permalloy Disc and Nanowire* The dipole current flow will spin up the vortex motion of ring currents in these nanowires. Remember, monopole field direction is unidirectional where one orientation affects electrons and the other direction affects protons. In the light of LENR reaction, how the infrared solitons, weak force, the strong force and PCN all fit together remains yet to be determined. What we must now do for the Ni/H reaction is find out where the strong monopole field is really coming from, the infrared solitons hot spot, or the ring currents in the nickel nanowires or both.
