On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: The problem I have with this is that it would allow any energy liberating > mechanism (even chemical reactions) to result in a particle simply "taking > off" > with the momentum later to be passed to some other particle somewhere else > (potentially anywhere), after light has had a chance to reach it. > > We don't see this happen. >
What about when Coulomb's law and a resulting drop-off in electrostatic influence on the basis of distance is factored in? In that case I wouldn't you see the usual d+d branches (e.g., t+p)? Eric
