I wrote:

> So, let's assume we have a test protocol such that:
>>
>
>>
> 1. The tamper-proof measuring system is taken to the lab and plugged in
>> and may not be unplugged.
>>
>
> A modern watt meter IS a tamper-proof measuring system. As I mentioned,
> they are made with integrated circuits these days. You cannot open one up
> and change the way it works. . . .
>

Having said all that, it would be cool to use a gasoline powered generator.
I just checked, and  they sell 3-phase portable generators. I guess you
could rent one.

That would shut up some of the skeptics.

It would only be practical to run it for ~8 hours when people are there.
Most of the small ones will not run overnight or continuously for weeks.
You have to get a natural-gas fired one for that. (My sister is getting a
single-phase one for her house. It is surprisingly cheap.)

If it ran for only 8 hours on the generator, the skeptics would say there
is a hidden battery that operated for 8 hours and after that Rossi went
back to his magic electric power input.

If I were Rossi or Levi, I would not lift a finger to satisfy the demands
of skeptics. I would, however, use a heavy duty industrial-grade power
meter. The one they used may be in that category:

http://www.industrial-needs.com/technical-data/power-anlayser-PCE-830.htm

I wouldn't know. It looks a smaller than the big wattmeters I saw years
ago, used by power company people and Hydrodynamics, but maybe these things
have shrunk, along with other test equipment. It sure has a lot of bells
and whistles.

- Jed

Reply via email to