> > From the moles: > > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBSjNFUkRSdVZxN1E/edit?usp=sharing
My current "best fit" for the waveforms is an almost-trapezoid Rise=20 Hold=130 Fall=30 http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_spice/130625_spice_01.png I've done a "good enough" digitization of the original waveform. Note that the amount of ripple in the waveform is fully accounted for by the input square-wave pulse. Any other ripple is additive. The only other explanation is that there's more "RC" in the circuit than in my model, which would cause the signal to "hold" longer at the tail. There is some RC in the flange and the ends .. but they also provide a path for pulling it down.
