"If cold fusion had been discovered in 1900 they would have worked on it like any other new discovery and probably figured it out about as quickly as they elucidated fission."
true ! in 1900 physics was not in "normal science" mode but in "early stage"... see how Sternglass discovery was accepted by einstein, yet ignored later... it would have been even more easy at the faraday time. theory is a trap. 2013/7/1 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > > . . . LENR surprises >> were and are much too unexpected- see a theory of Surprise >> on the Web >> > > I think Alain meant there was nothing surprising about the reaction to > cold fusion. The spiteful rejection, that is. Martin Fleischmann expected > this. I think Pons was surprised by it, or at least, by the intensity of it. > > Technically it was surprising. Perhaps it was the most surprising > discovery in the history of technology. I guess radium and radioactivity > were about as surprising, but cold fusion was discovered after people > thought they understood nuclear reactions in detail. It turns out they > don't understand them. > > If cold fusion had been discovered in 1900 they would have worked on it > like any other new discovery and probably figured it out about as quickly > as they elucidated fission. > > - Jed > >
