Jones, you are positing a lot in this sequence of IR stimulation to the SiC tube in which the SS reactor is nested, the possibility of SS as acting like a membrane for f/h formed in the catalyst is intriguing. I agree that ZPE is far more likely than people have so far been willing to admit and your fractional membrane concept might better explain the hydrogen losses claimed by Rossi. I also agree that f/h can persist for some time without suppression geometry to migrate thru the SS membrane but those conditions remain unclear.. Moddel's calculations regarding the pumping of gas thru their prototype device is telling us that gas atoms can be translated rapidly in and out of fractional states without additional opposition. My take is based on Naudts relativistic hydrogen..the fractional steps are not spatial- random motion can now push hydrogen on an axis that is temporal from our perspective allowing a back door solution to building a Maxwellian demon based on ZPE, the geometry creates segregated regions of different suppression values where random motion provides the motive force for f/h modifications... Haish and Modell suggest Lamb Pinch, but I posit the covalent bond is being exploited by Rossi and Mills, The bond must oppose change in suppression value more strongly than atomic hydrogen which easily changes to the new suppression value and reforms a new fractional molecule and emits a photon. The bond can apparently allow a f/h molecule to exit the suppression region into the lattice and thru the SS membrane to couple with plasmons in the SiC interface. The bond maintains the fractional value the constituent atoms were at upon formation but lowers the disassociation threshold proportional to the difference in supression such that it can cascade all the way back to a normal hydrogen molecule thru a series of disassociations / reformations with photon emissions. I don't think the bond is strong enough to allow f/h to exist without some kind of confinement which is why Mills is unable to show anyone a hydrino. Fran From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Vicinal chemistry, plasmons, Jovion and HotCat
From: Teslaalset Why would Rossi not put SiC powder in the inner cylinder instead? Plasmons apparently form polaritons most readily at the interface between a metal surface and an insulator ... but not so readily on a ceramic powder itself (without metal contact) - so one interpretation of that requirement is that having two surfaces which are very close together like nested tubes - is helpful for this outcome when one is metal and the other is ceramic. But the short answer is that Rossi was probably aware, as he was increasing the temperature in his testing - that his steel cylinder was sagging at high temperature (or failing) and he needed the support of a high temperature ceramic. He may have been lucky with the choice of SiC, or else he, or someone on his staff has great insight. IOW - Rossi may not have known of the incredibly steep peak of reflectance for SiC at 10 microns, leading to superradiance - but he was fortunate to be in a particular Italian Lab (with Focardi) where SiC is routinely used, so it was available - and he quickly found that it worked very well.
