Greetings Terry,
> > Terry, have you come across this photo before? > > What have you heard about its provenance? > > I have not; but, understand that I have been out of the biness > for over a decade. I do, however, find it fascinating. It is > not the nose which strikes me; but, it is the hair. It looks > very non-human with an odd texture. It's the irises that intrigue me. They are larger than normal, like those that belong to a baby or very young child. Of course the color is a tad different! Just speculating here... there has been some talk that if Homo Sapiens continue to evolve there's a possibility that we will continue to carry over additional child like physical traits into adulthood. The rounder face, and larger irises would be additional extensions of physical child like traits. The implication is that this photo could possibly suggest what we might very well look like 10k - 50k years from now. > The story of battle between Aquarius and Comm 12 seems a bit > strained; especially about the strike on the Pentagon being > a missle instead of a plane. The debris and damage do not > support the missle idea, IMO. I agree. I don't buy the missile explanation at all. PS: Nevertheless, I love the photo of the "alien", regardless of the fact that common logic and rationality suggest it's nothing more than a clever fake. I learned long ago that it is often best not to pass judgment on the sources of most myths. All the really matters to me is whether the myth evokes my imagination. IMHO, that's what a damned good myth should do! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
