Here is a movie of two nanoparticles touching. Notice the space above the point of contract is topologically identical to a crack on the surface of a material.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK58AnokWl4 On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > *“generally too big to achieve what I think is required”* > > This is a false assumption not supported by experimental observation. > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opTbxZwUisg > > > > Because of electrostatic surface forces inherent in all types of > nanoparticles, nanoparticle attracts each other. When free to move, > nanoparticles will eventually touch and arrogate together. The irregular > spaces around the point of particle contact is what we are discussing as > the NAE. > > When nanoparticles touch at a contract point, this topology is the > strongest generator of electromagnetic resonance. > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Fran, the gap between nano-particles is arbitrary, undefined, and >> generally too big to achieve what I think is required. In addition, CF >> occurs in the absence of nano-particles. Therefore, their presence is not >> required. We agree that a gap is required. The only difference is in how >> the gap forms. I believe a gap formed by stress relief is more general in >> its formation and has properties that I believe are important, that a gap >> between arbitrary particles having an unknown and complex shape does not >> have. That is the only difference between our views about a gap. >> >> Ed >> >> On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote: >> >> Ed,**** >> I don’t understand why you are so reluctant to consider >> the gap between nanoparticles as capable of supporting NAE. The geometry is >> essentially the inverse of a skeletal catalyst- I am more likely to believe >> the particles are inert and solid - only the geometry formed between >> particles is active – it is the same region that experiences stiction >> force which tends to make these gaps even smaller to the limit of particle >> shape and packing geometry. I think the micro scale tubules used by Rossi >> may combine micro and nano cavities as the bodies both pack together and >> their protrusions interlace to form smaller and smaller pockets between the >> particles. Perhaps a marriage made in heaven if the IR energy feeding >> plasmons theory has any weight.**** >> Fran **** >> ** ** >> *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> >> ] >> *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2013 11:55 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Cc:* Edmund Storms >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Interesting paper from nature about >> successful cold fusion experiment**** >> ** ** >> I'm glad to see a paper by Mizuno. But this paper raises an interesting >> question, Are nanoparticles the NAE? **** >> ** ** >> I personally believe nanoparticles alone are inert. However, particles >> of a critical size are the HOST for the NAE. In other words, the nano-gap I >> propose to be the NAE grows in a particle and the particle size determines >> the size of the gap. After all, CF has been found to occur under a variety >> of conditions, including in complete absence of nanoparticles. However, >> nano-gaps can form in any material, but not frequently with the correct >> dimension. **** >> ** ** >> The power being generated is determined by the number NAE present. The >> better the material is able to create nano-gaps, the more power will be >> produced. Use of small particles improves this ability. Consequently, I'm >> suggesting that people should not focus on the particle itself but on what >> is happening within the particle. Unless the NAE is produced within the >> particle, the particle is inert no matter what size it has. **** >> ** ** >> Ed**** >> On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:**** >> >> >> **** >> Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote:**** >> ** ** >> >> Eric, ion bombardment has a rich literature containing 90 references in >> my library. You need to read this before speculation is useful. Ion >> bombardment can produce either hot fusion and/or cold fusion, depending on >> the conditions and applied energy. Low energy favors cold fusion if the NAE >> is present and high energy favors hot fusion without a NAE.**** >> >> ** ** >> At ICCF18 I will be presenting a poster session paper by Mizuno showing >> that ion bombardment iteself can create the NAE. It produces nanoparticles >> on wires subjected to glow discharge for about 3 days. He has SEM photos >> and excess heat results showing this.**** >> ** ** >> Mizuno himself cannot attend.**** >> ** ** >> - Jed**** >> ** ** >> ** ** >> >> >> >
