Thanks for posting this. If Ericsson and Pomp are the best thing the skeptics can come up with, Levi et al. are sitting pretty. It's over. This is like the evolution debate between Huxley and "Soapy Sam" Wilberforce, or Fleischmann versus Morrison:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanreplytothe.pdf E&P made fools of themselves. I expect this is the best any skeptic can come up with. I doubt there are any other skeptical arguments waiting in the wings, unless you count the "invisible wire" cheese hypothesis. Höistad is quoted: "It is very unfortunate that Ericsson Pomp and resort to wicked and mischievous comments." I wouldn't say that. Not wicked and it does not succeed at mischief. It is just silly and tiresome. - Jed
