Curious, that the Navy cites Mitchell Swartz's applications (and Arata) as
prior art - all of which have NOT been granted, and the Navy does NOT
mention the one which they flagrantly copy. We need a massive overhaul of
USPTO due to extreme incompetence.

 

US Navy or not . this patent seems to be "borrowing" the prior art of the
Cincinnati group: "Pressurized electro-hydraulic processing" - It is a bit
irksome that the military gets a free ride from USPTO in many cases such as
this. The Cincinnati process remediated (transmuted) thorium in an
electrochemical process but they gave up trying to fight the patent office.


US 20030201167 A1

http://www.google.com/patents/US20030201167

 

It is no wonder that Mitchell is bitter over his treatment by USPTO -- when
several recent WPO patents have been granted which clearly mention LENR and
would have been invalidated, had Mitchell's prior applications been granted,
as they should have been.

 

Jones

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

https://www.google.com/patents/US8419919?dq=11/859,499
<https://www.google.com/patents/US8419919?dq=11/859,499&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A5rfUe
70HMen4AO3yIFw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA>
&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A5rfUe70HMen4AO3yIFw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA

 

This U.S. Navy patent transmutes radioactive elements into less harmful
elements through a benign low energy nuclear reaction process. The patent
was granted April 16, 2013 for a device and method that shortens the
half-life of radioactive materials by increasing their rate of emissions.

 

"Method and Apparatus for Generating Particles," the content of which is
fully incorporated by reference herein.

 

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 

 

The embodiments of the invention relate generally to the field of
electrochemistry.

 

Generated particles may be captured by other nuclei to create new elements,
to remediate nuclear waste, to treat cancerous tumors, or to create
strategic materials.

 

Reply via email to