The evidence is overwhelming. 

. and as I've been saying for many years, electrons (and likely other
subatomic 'particles') are a dipole-like oscillation of the underlying
vacuum.

 

"Imaging electron pairing in a simple magnetic superconductor"

http://phys.org/news/2013-07-imaging-electron-pairing-simple-magnetic.html

 

excerpt:

"With the samples held in the microscope far below their superconducting
temperature, the scientists sent in bursts of energy to break apart the
electron pairs. The amount of energy it takes to break up the pair is known
as the superconducting energy gap.  When the pairs break up, the two
electrons move off in opposite directions."

 

Emphasis on:

"WHEN THE PAIRS BREAK UP, THE TWO ELECTRONS MOVE OFF IN ***OPPOSITE***
DIRECTIONS"

 

There are several other examples of subatomic events where like or dislike
particles go shooting off in opposite directions.

QM cannot explain this since there is no physical or geometric element to
the model.

 

This type of physical model is what's missing from QM. and it explains a lot
of observed phenomena, including:

- electrons tunneling 'thru' the nucleus

- "flying off in opposite directions"

- LIKE charge particles pairing up when they should be REPULSIVE (ying/yang;
two such oscillations 180 degs out of phase)

- the reason why the E and B fields of an EM wave are perpendicular

 

An electron is a PRESSURE oscillation of the vacuum. 

 

Model the vacuum as a near frictionless fluid under extreme pressure.
Without a 'pressure', you have no impetus for movement at that scale.
Assume the vacuum (zero point field) is at pressure 'p'.  The electron
involves an oscillation of the ZPF, and at its extremity, manifests itself
as a region of pressure p+x on one side of the atom, and p-x (electron hole)
on the OPPOSITE side of the atom.  10^-15 seconds later, the e- and the
e-hole would appear to have exchanged sides.  When you take ten thousand
'snapshots' of a hydrogen atom over time, or with a very slow shutter speed
which is what most observations of an electron were done with, the electron
APPEARS as a spherical shell since the dipolar oscillation is free to rotate
in 3D about its center of oscillation; its center of oscillation being more
of less in the 'nucleus' of the atom.

 

If a single Hydrogen atom were held in an atom trap, and using static E
and/or B fields, at some threshold field strength, the 'spherical' shell of
the e- would disappear and reveal the electron's true nature, which is a
dipole-like structure/shape.   And they are getting close to achieving that:

  "Submicrometer Position Control of Single Trapped Neutral Atoms"

http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v95/i3/e033002

 

This also ties in very nicely with the recently referenced work of Arie De
Geus and Arthur Summera (the Electrinium Battery) mentioned in this msg: 

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg84330.html

 

Protons are similar oscillations, only at a much higher frequency and thus,
much smaller dimension.

 

The clues continue to mount-up.

;-)

 

Anyone out there have the mathematical background to model this model???

 

-Mark Iverson

 

Reply via email to