Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: New Energy Times has a preview > http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/07/17/iccf-18-cold-fusion-conference-begins-next-week/
A dumb comment: "Funding and recognition has been difficult for these researchers. A significant reason is that many of them give the field the appearance of pseudoscience. There is no scientific evidence for LENR as “cold fusion,” yet many longtime researchers in the field remain wedded to the belief that deuterium nuclei can overcome the Coulomb barrier at appreciable rates at room temperature." I've said it before but I'll say it again: A person without a PhD in nuclear physics should not make pronouncements like this one. > and a useful unofficial collection of all the abstracts : > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2013/ICCF18/ICCF-18-Abstracts-Unofficial.pdf He left out mine. . . . Which may be another example of someone without professional qualifications pontificating about science: http://iccf18.research.missouri.edu/files/day2/Lessons_From_Cold_Fusion_archives.pdf At least I have a better sense of humor than Krivit, and I will be quoting Fleischmann and Bockris who were amusing people. - Jed
