>From past information, the Rossi reactor is hard to startup; it takes a long time to startup and a long time to shut down. In the recent Rossi reactor test, the testers did not see how poorly the reactor startup process was.
This is tolerable in industry but not in the home. This must be due to the mouse and cat design. >From public reports and demo witnesses, the Defkalion reactor starts up briskly and shuts down responsively. Defkalion is proud to show their startup/shutdown process in the upcoming demo/tests. They must believe that this responsive control feature is a competitive advantage for them. This responsive control is required in home installations and shows that the Defkalion reactor has a decent level of adjustable control whereas the Rossi reactor does not have good control. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: > How do you know this? > > [mg] > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Defkalion has a much superior technology. You can just ignore Rossi. >> >> >> 2013/7/18 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >> >>> >>> This puts to rest Guglinski's worry that Rossi might drop dead, and the >>> secrets might die with him, the way Patterson's secrets did. Ross has >>> transferred his knowledge to another group of people, who have proved they >>> mastered his knowledge. They are not all going to die at one time, so the >>> secret will not be lost no matter what happens. (This is real life, not a >>> thriller movie.) >>> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> [email protected] >> > >
