High loading would be .88 which is 267K == -6.15C = 21F which is not room
temperature.

Which raises the question:  Is there a critical loading threshold for Ni?


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:

> Since exceeding the Debye temperature of nickel appears to be necessary to
> produce heat from Ni-H systems, I was wondering if the Debye temperature of
> palladium must be exceeded too in Pd systems. I did a search for the Debye
> of temperature of palladium and found this abstract from 1966:
>
> http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v146/i2/p463_1
>
> C. A. 
> Mackliet<http://publish.aps.org/search/field/author/C.%20A.%20Mackliet>and A.
> I. Schindler<http://publish.aps.org/search/field/author/A.%20I.%20Schindler>
> U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D. C.
>
> Received 31 January 1966; published in the issue dated June 1966
>
> Specific-heat measurements in the 1.2 to 4.2°K range have been carried out
> on four H-Pd specimens having H/Pd atomic ratios of 0.57, 0.70, 0.81, and
> 0.88. Corresponding values of γ (the electronic-specific-heat
> coefficient) are 2.52, 1.38, 1.40, and 1.61 mJ/deg2 per g atom of
> palladium; values of ΘD (the Debye temperature) are 282, 273, 276, and
> 267°K, respectively. A "dynamic" method of measurement was necessarily
> employed because of the occurrence of an exothermic process in these
> alloys. The interpretation of the data was complicated by the interstitial
> character of these alloys, but the present results for the electronic
> specific heat appear to offer unusually direct support for the usual simple
> band picture of Pd and H-Pd alloys. Special care must be exercised in the
> interpretation of the Debye temperatures in this case.
>
>
>
>
>
> What is the  "exothermic process in these alloys". Is it an anomalous heat
> effect or expected chemical effect? Anyway you can see that the Debye
> temperature of Pd is much lower than Nickel so it doesn't doesn't
> require any prewarming if it is at room temperature.
>
>
>
> harry
>
>
>
> Harry
>
>
>

Reply via email to