the B field of an orbiting 1s electron about a H nucleus is about 12T at the nucleus.
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:46:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion/MFMP implications for electrolysis? From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Jones, Where was that claim made? did they mean uT? Stewart On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: From: Jack Cole 1) Brillouin Energy's method of electrolysis would seem likely to elevate the cathode temperature >179C. Could this be a factor in Godes' success? It is looking like there is nothing there with Brillouin. Months ago, they received a very large grant for testing at SRI. It’s a pretty good bet that if anything had turned up in that testing (and it should have turned up weeks ago if it was there) –some news would have surfaced at ICCF, formally or informally. In fact, the local rumors are that there has been no glimmer of success at all. The most surprising detail to come out of the whole conference IMHO - if it can be believed - is the report of the very high magnetic field of DGT. Other prior experiments which showed a well-define trigger temperature, such as Ahern’s - showed much higher trigger than ~180C, but he had no significant magnetic field at all. That low trigger temp could be related to the high field – if DGT are to be believed. In fact, the fact that this kind of field strength is easy to document - but was not documented - casts significant doubt on the entire DGT presentation. Many of us who were bullish on that demo a few days ago have shifted 180 degrees and are not skeptical simply because of this claim of 1.6 Tesla. It is almost preposterous. That kind of field at 20 cm from the device (their claim) would be pulling tools from across the room. Jones
