thanks, I know I had seen something like that around here.
I guess that I will not be able to convince a diehard skeptic in 5 days of
running. But it should give them something to think about.
I do have test points so that they can get R's from hand meters and not have to
put trust in some computer display alone.
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:24:14 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kitamura much improved
>
> > From: "DJ Cravens" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:10:03 PM
>
> > Alen, where can I find your fakes calculator.
> > What have you got as the high for chemistry for a sealed unit (i.e.
> > no O2 access)?
> > with Li batteries, I think you can get up to 4MJ/L (but I don't know
> > how anyone could
> > actually put them inside a sphere with a 1/8npt hole- or how they
> > could survive welding hemispheres).
> >
> > I figure at 450ml that could be 1.8MJ possible or about 500Wh. So I
> > guess I would need about 21 days..... or better 2 months.
> >
> > Is that about what you get?
>
> My Lithium battery number is 3.6MJ/L -- so that's about right.
>
> The current version is at
> http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_proof_frames_v430.php
>
> Fixed Energy Fakes starts here.
> <http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_proof_v430.php#fixedenergyfakes>
>
> This was mostly designed for the Rossi experiments, so a lot of them are
> X+Air or X+Stored oxygen.
>
> Most of the energy density values are from wiki.
>
> Note that (despite Jed's objections) my calculation assumes that the entire
> volume if fakium, so any actual implementation would be way less.
>
> (Might be quicker just to do a spreadsheet than plug your values into my
> fakes calculator. Be a coupla/few hours to get round to it.)
>
