There must be an underlying psychological reason for thinking this way because it is not based on logic or experience; a prejudice in judgment or a unfounded distaste may be at play. Both Rossi and Defkalion have released this isotopic dependency in their technical papers and patents.
What basic can support as judgment of "red herring." Clearly it is not a scientific or logical one. Can you explain the reasoning behind this surprising pronouncement? On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:25 PM, DJ Cravens <[email protected]> wrote: > > I doubt that isotopically enriched material (other than perhaps H 2) is >> needed. >> In the real world, you just make your sample larger. >> > > I doubt there is much if any of an isotope effect. This one says to me, > "red herring." > > Eric > >
