On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
Eric, > all you need is a bit of patience and you will get the specific > data and info you want/need. What exactly has high priority for > you? Can I help you? > Peter > I have questions for them, but I'm a little worried about an infinite regress, especially if the replies are conveyed second-hand; I'll mention them anyway and let you decide what to do with them. - How long does the magnetic field last? Does it correlate with their reaction? Why didn't we see its effects in the video? Is it generally in the neighborhood of 1+ Tesla when the reaction is underway? - What is the box of shielding around the reactor for? Is it first and foremost to protect electronics from the magnetic field? Is it first and foremost related to radiation? - How did they determine that 61Ni is unreactive? Did they do an isotopic analysis? Can they provide any details about the isotopic analysis if they did one? For example, did they purchase pure isotopes and try them out? - When they talk about Rydberg hydrogen, are they specifically saying that the Rydberg excitation is in the hydrogen and not in the nickel? Or is it also, or primarily, in the nickel? - Does their device run on pure hydrogen? Does it require deuterium impurity? These are the main questions that come to mind at this point, but I'm sure I'll think of others. Eric
