Peter,
My concept of a geometry induced environment may give you less
indigestion, not because it denies the importance of cracks, but because it
only provides an intermediate source of energy that is not nuclear. Cracks are
a concise description of dynamic casimir geometry, gas atoms that migrate
through a crack will experience a change in Casimir suppression value as they
migrate from the mouth of the crack down into the more confined regions, IMHO
this increase in catalytic/casimir force when combined with the rigid spatial
confinement of skeletal catalyst or bulk powders is responsible for inverting
Rydberg atoms..or hydinos or fractional hydrogen [choose your preferred label].
Modell, Mills, Rossi and many others have trotted out their theories on how
these condensed states of hydrogen could lead to anomalous energy.. some go
directly to nuclear while others like myself predict reversible chemical
reactions powered by random gas motion between regions with different values of
Casimir suppression. The Haisch Modell patent is based on gas atoms being
pumped thru tunnels drilled thru alternate layers of suppressed metal geometry
and insulating layers [ cracks by design], the interesting point is that
Professor Modell's math indicates that the pressure needed to pump the gas thru
these alternating regions does not increase even though the atoms are
transitioning in and out of suppression. The atoms appear to get restored to
normal ground state by the isotropy once removed from the suppressed
environment such that certain chemical reactions executed while suppressed
become strained when the suppression dissipates reducing the energy required to
reverse it. IMHO this geometry forms a maxwellian demon powered by random
motion that sorts based on gas atoms based on chemical state where unreacted
gas atoms move easier than reacted ones. I don't deny a nuclear component to
the anomalous heat but I am convinced there is at least a zero point bootstrap
made possible by these "cracks".
Fran
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:37 AM
To: VORTEX
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
Dear Ed,
I hope my ideas will eventually help you to improve our
theory- this works in case I am really in multiple fatal error.
The future will show, it is nothing personal and i am not angry
because you have told that I am not able to understand your
concept of NAE.
What has made me to worry was that you have repeatedly
said that NSE is a very simple concept
I think and I hope NAE is NOT cracks fpr the reasons shown
in the essay. Summa summarum, cracks have no future
and NAE has to be a smart concept, complex.
Best wishes,
Peter
-
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Ed,
Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers.
I am reading everything you are publishing; then perhaps the
problem is my limited or absent understanding.
I hope you are perfectly understanding what you write and will
be able to show at the target where and what I am telling that is
not correct, scientific, is misleading.
I have written first about CF happening in active sites starting
in 1991.
Anyway please make your critic constructive by telling us if the
NAE are cracks or not, if not, then what is their structure and function.
Dear Peter,
The NAE in my theory are cracks of a especially small gap size that are
generated by stress relief in the material. They permit formation of a
structure that is able to lower the Coulomb barrier and dissipate the energy by
emission of low energy photons from the nucleus. The theory shows how helium,
tritium and deuterium are made by the fusion process, what conditions are
required for the process to work, and identifies engineering variables that are
needed to control the process. Many details are descried in the papers I have
already sent to CMNS and more will be provided in my ICCF-18 paper. I suggest
you study these papers before jumping to any conclusions. In addition, If you
need more clarification, please ask.
Ed
Thank you in advance in the name of my readers,
Peter
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Peter, why do you write about subjects that you know nothing about? You
obviously have not read or understood what I propose. You have not asked
questions or discussed this with me. You make statements that have no
relationship to what I have proposed or even to general knowledge about the
subject. Please, if you want to be a spokesman for the field, at least learn
something about the subject you are discussing.
Indeed, I find your approach to be very common in this field. People reach
conclusions about cold fusion without any knowledge of what is known about the
subject or even what is accepted in conventional science. I can understand why
conventional scientists think the people who believe CF is real are deluded. If
I had not studied what is known and seen the effect myself, I would be one of
them. Several people have remarked to me just how low the standards are in
this field. We need to do better.
Ed
On Aug 19, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Friends,
Please read, criticize, and improve the ideas published here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/some-reasons-why-lenr-nae-cannot-be.html
Believe me, I am sincere and serious here, and it is not a case of
crackophobia.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CMNS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
