yes, but the demo is over now and the sphere has been cut open.
 
I do not plan on presueing this approach.  
It was just a one shot because I make a promise to a friend.  
 
D2

 
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:59:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dennis Cravens' LENR demonstration at NI Week
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

You had written:

I have some stainless steel ones that have been slightly warm (0.5 C) since 
last Nov.
Realize the spheres are just one of many things I am working on. You need to 
operate with excitation and higher temps for more power. The spheres are just a 
stepping stone on a much longer path – a slight diversion on the way to my real 
goal.
With a slight modification to your demo, you may break through the cold fusion 
public relations problem:
Simply heat the bath in which both balls sit.  The importance of this cannot be 
overemphasized as it will dramatically decrease the duration of the 
demonstration required to rule out internal energy storage, and these public 
relations demos invariably have a short attention span.





On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:17 PM, DJ Cravens <[email protected]> wrote:




yes, I opened it on Thurs. 
 
There will be an article in Infinite Energy in the next month or two.
I think they also plan on having the article on there web site. 
It has been written, edited and scheduled for publication.

 
Yes the sample was hotter than the control.  But the really important point is 
that it was hotter than the bath it was in by about 4C.
 
Dennis
 
PS you can see a little about it via E cat world, and Cold fusion now sites.

 
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:52:12 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Subject: [Vo]:Dennis Cravens' LENR demonstration at NI Week


  

    
  
  
    You know, the two spheres, one running hotter than the other.

      He said "come back Thursday to see
          what's inside."

          I have not seen anything
              written about this.  Did he open
              it up?

                                                  

                                          

Reply via email to