http://166.111.26.4/3progress/3transmutation/32Miley/2005MileyGHoverviewofa(ICCF12Paper) .pdf
*OVERVIEW OF LIGHT WATER/HYDROGEN-BASED LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS * ** A quantitative measure of the yield of transmutation products (and isotopic shifts from natural distribution in key products) in 4 major atomic groups (6-18, 22-35, 44-54, 75-85) were obtained by Miley, Patterson et al. [1]. Others also have reported significant nuclear reaction products and isotopic shifts in light water LENRs. In some cases of the observed elements were from the Lanthanide Group, including Lu, Tb, Pr, Eu, Sm, Gd, Dy, Ho, Nd and Yb. It is widely accepted that these rare earth elements are less likely to be found as impurities, strengthening confidence in their results (although most researchers have tried to rule out mistakes due to impurities vs. the common "product" elements such as Fe, Cu, Ag, Zn, Au, etc via analysis of cell components, electrodes and electrolyte prior to LENR runs). Isotopic shifts are another key feature often cited against mistaken identification of impurities as reaction products. Violante’s study showed that the 63Cu /65Cu isotopic ratio shifted [33]. In this Ni-hydride film work the most abundant copper isotope was 65Cu with a shift from natural distribution by 1360%. Cirillo and Iorio found Re, Os, Au, Hf, Tl, Er, and Yb on the surface of the cathode, which was not present before the reactions [9]. Ohmori et al. reported finding Hg, Kr, Ni and Fe with anomalous compositions in Au electrodes during light water electrolysis [29]. In addition Si, Mg with other anomalous compositions were also detected in the precipitates separated from the Au electrode after 4 electrolysis at extremely high current densities. They found significant deviations from natural values. Minor product elements such as Os, W, and Ru in particular showed large deviation, whereas elements with larger yields like Pb and Ag rarely showed significant deviations. And so on... On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:12 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Its hard to relate this to LENR in D/Pd systems. If you ad a D or H to a > palladium and the created instable nucleus (Ag*) emit an alpha, > > it will create some mostly unstable nuclides of rhodium. Rh103 is the only > stabile rhodium. H+Pd106 will give the stabile Rh103 and there are no > > stabile Pd for making Rh103 from D. If more alphas is ejected the problem > with instability becomes lager Tc or instable Nb. > > If the H or D are ejected at the same time as Palladium gives of an > alpha, you may have a ruthenium. The can the fusing hydrogen be ejected in > this way? > > Probably not. > > > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:02:01 -0400, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > The tendency for Helium production in LENR transmutation could well be > the result of the inherent nature of the nucleus to be constructed out of > alpha particle clusters. The alpha particle cluster model is one of the > enduring concepts that run through all the various theories of nuclear > structure. > > As background, one of the original motivations behind the alpha-particle > model of the nucleus in the 1930s was the fact that, among the naturally > radioactive nuclei, the alpha particle was known to be one of the principal > emissions. Since such radioactivity is conceptualized as the evaporation of > alpha-particles from the nuclear surface, the high rate of alpha particle > production suggested that alphas might exist, at least transiently, as > bound systems on the nuclear surface. > > > Quasi-fission and multi-fragmentation experiment conducted in the early > 1970s inspired interest in nuclear clustering in light of experimental > findings that when medium and large nuclei are bombarded with relatively > high-energy particles – not merely enough to strip the nucleus of one or a > few nucleons, but enough to shatter it into small fragments, there is an > unexpectedly large number of alpha particles and multiples of alpha > particles among the break-up fragments. Such results are strong indication > that there is alpha clustering throughout the interior of all nuclei – > small, medium and large (MacGregor,1976). > > > Furthermore, experimental elements transmutation results released by DGT > in their ICCF-17 paper that document a large accumulation of lithium, boron > and beryllium transmutation products support the alpha cluster model of the > nucleus. These light elements are just bigger chunks of nuclear alpha > particle modulo fragments blasted off the nuclei of heavy elements as a > result of a fission based transmutation process. > > The ash assay from the Rossi reactor has shown that 10% of the nickel was > transmuted into iron. The Iron nucleus is just one alpha particle lighter > than the nickel nucleus. Most F-P advocates deny this experimental result > as damaging to the deuterium fusion genesis of helium. > > > Low energy LENR experiments as typified by the Fleischmann and Pons > experiments might be only strong enough to chip of a piece of the nuclear > structure in a fission reaction thereby releasing some nuclear binding > energy. It is an unsubstantiated assumption the D+D->He4 in PdD systems > even exists let alone if that reaction correlates with power output in a > LENR reaction. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Friends, >> I have published now: >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/for-future-of-lenr-by-abd-ul-rahman.html >> This is actually the 3rd paper from the series:" Ideas and modes of >> thinking for solving the LENR problem" i.e making it to progress >> *My gratitude to the author!* >> Abd and I know well it is not one single royal way to a successful LENR; >> we also are aware that if intelligence can be defined as the art of >> not confusing the points of view- wisdom includes the respect of >> other people's points of view. We both want to bring new proofs >> to the old saying promoted by Niels Bohr: "CONTRADICTORIA COMPLEMENTA >> SUNT" >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >
