This may be an interesting development:

<http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com/new-discovery-simplifies-quantum-physics/>
Ron

--On Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:12 PM -0400 Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:



I am getting a bad feeling that LENR is still here way before its time.
Science is not at a stage that will accept LENR as a possibility. It
looks to me like magnetism is a key factor in the quantum mechanical
processes at the heart of the disruption of nuclear stability.

Looking back at the recent history of experimental and theoretical
physics that occurred in the mid 1990's, magnetism turned out to be
the primary causative factor in the weird and hard to understand
experimental results that first revealed the quantum hall effect.
Experiments showed that resistance could be quantized when electrons
were highly constrained dimensionally and were also acted on by a strong
magnetic field.

Even weirder, electric charge could be fractionalized when electrons
were exposed to a strong magnetic field.

This process of electron charge fractionalization is very difficult to
visualize physically. So physicists have come up with a quasiparticle
concept called a composite fermion to depict what is happening to many
electrons affected by a strong magnetic field.

Back then, the physics community was pained to explain this perplexing
experimental fractional charge result. But this experimental shock
created a new burst of innovation in string theory and quantum field
theory which is still nascent and not yet fully understood.

There are still many perplexities in particle physics.

Almost half a century ago, Yang and Mills introduced a remarkable new
framework to describe elementary particles using structures that also
occur in geometry. Quantum Yang-Mills theory is now the foundation of
most of elementary particle theory, and its predictions have been tested
at many experimental laboratories, but its mathematical foundation is
still unclear. The successful use of Yang-Mills theory to describe the
strong interactions of elementary particles depends on a subtle quantum
mechanical property called the "mass gap:" the quantum particles have
positive masses, even though the classical waves travel at the speed of
light. This property has been discovered by physicists from experiment
and confirmed by computer simulations, but it still has not been
understood from a theoretical point of view. Progress in establishing
the existence of the Yang-Mills theory and a mass gap and will require
the introduction of fundamental new ideas both in physics and in
mathematics.

The Clay Mathematics Institute American Mathematical Society has offered
a million dollar prize to anyone who can supply this new physics and
mathematics.

http://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/MPPc.pdf

This tells me that the theoretical and mathematical foundation that a
valid theory of LENR can be built on is not in place yet.

LENR is very much like the fractionalized quantum Hall Effect (FQHE) in
that electrons and quarks are fermions. But where in the FQHE, the
strong directly applied magnetic field causes the charge of the electron
to be cut to factions and even completely eliminated, the strong
magnetic fields involved in LENR causes the charges of quarks to be
greatly reduced or even completely eliminated.

When the charge and spin properties of the quarks in the nucleus are
disrupted in the nucleus, new quark configurations will after the strong
magnetic field is removed. This is the basis of transmutation and even
fusion.


Where theoretical physics finally realizes this experimental wonder that
is LENR, there will be a new rebirth in string and quantum field theory
thinking not unlike what is currently happening with the FQHE.


Theoretical physics has been alienated by completely inappropriate
theoretical explanations of LENR experimental results over the decades
that counter the current theoretical directions and aspirations of
theoretical physics. In this branch of conservative science, much damage
to the credibility of LENR has been done that can only be corrected by
the Rossi method of pushing experimental reality in the face of 
incomplete theoretical physics through the release of a hitherto
completely magical and unexplained commercial product.

 


 



On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>
wrote:


Dear Friends,


I published now: 
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/09/everything-i-knew-about-cold-fus
ion-was.html


It is an appeal to a Paradigm Shift, actually I have published these
ideas long ago, now I just made a synthesis of them.
I am realist and I know this paper will have a limited impact,
preponderemtly negative. I don't csre. I care for the future of LENR.
LENR will be technological, or will not be.


Peter


--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




Reply via email to