Jones, I agree with your last statement, I do not necessarily differentiate between dark energy and dark matter, I think it is all primarily vacuum energy curled up into at least six extra dimensions of space within our 3-dimensions of space. I think the cores of most all of these "gravitational" bodies are black branes, including comet nuclei. I consider this some of the missing "dark matter" that is encased within a baryonic crust from decay. You can pack a hell of alot of mass/energy into a volume with x^6 additional volume space to store it. I believe the core of the Earth may be a six dimensional brain (like a torroid) see http://cronodon.com/Atomic/String_Theory.html and our magnetic fields are strings(1-branes) of vacuum energy looping around the poles and making up her tail. Hurricanes, waterspouts, mesovortex tornadoes and our jet streams, etc. are all created by these decaying strings interacting with our atmosphere and earthen matter. The Moore tornado released between 8 and 600 times the energy of the Hiroshima bomb within 40 minutes and I do not believe there is any way in hell air and water vapor alone can do that. The destruction was a release of entropy within those overhead strings through quantum decoherence.
These branes are all decaying at their surface and create a firewall of LENR reactions and decaying to protons (h+) and they "leak" energetic branes of vacuum energy into the space around them. M theory predicts 11 dimensions of space (one is time that I see as really decay, but that is for another discussion) and explains gravity as possibly caused by a multi-dimensional brane (such as possibly the core of the Sun) "leaking" branes into other dimensions of space (our 3 - within the solar wind). In other words, the Earth is orbiting the Sun and "pulls a vacuum" on it and is rewarded with energetic vacuum particles that decay space and inflate into strings and form our weather disturbances as they decay in our atmosphere. And we humans are really just "baryonic crust dwellers" living on a brane. :) We are living each day of our lives through the same process that theoretical physics predicts the universe started from in my model. Our lives unfold from the Sun and our weather is really our decaying quantum gravity field and many clouds are "topological defects" and density differences. "Branes bring Rain" as they decay and ionize our atmosphere. I think Einstein was only partially correct, space is not smoothly warping around gravitational bodies, the space is full of these energetic, massive vacuum branes accelerating, inflating and decaying between bodies. Which explains why the universe is not teeming with life because gravity is really created by energetic vacuum decaying space between branes and we walk a fine balance with the anthropic principal. This decaying vacuum energy gradually ionizes and decays us humans over 80 years or so, some sooner. Last weird thing and I will let you go. My model shows that vacuum energy just caused the Green Bay, WI bridge to buckle through ionization and accelerated decay... http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/09/27/the-reaper-is-hiding-in-the-fog/ Fog has killed before and now I think I know why...IT IS OUR DECAYING QUANTUM VACUUM field http://io9.com/5955311/the-london-fog-that-killed-over-ten-thousand-people Until further notice please walk around sinkholes and stay out of the fog :) Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > There was almost no doubt that Stewart would jump onto this topic with a > smile on his face – and there appears to be a pretty convincing > cross-connection between sunspots and planetary tidal forces (not just > Jupiter but others as well) locked into some kind of a cosmic slow dance, > as he mentions on his site. **** > > ** ** > > And the dark-matter input also sounds logical, due to the gammas. Yet the > calculation of the intensity of tidal forces, as felt by the sun is > miniscule – almost nothing, at least on paper as far as the gravitational > component.**** > > ** ** > > Thus - the problem is that these two phenomena taken together implies an > extreme amplification factor or similar reactive connection between dark > matter and gravity – intense focusing, as if small variation in gravity > would magnify dark matter by a very large ratio. **** > > ** ** > > How does that happen? That part does not seem to follow from the suspected > properties of dark matter… and gravitational “lensing” requires > galaxy-level mass, millions of solar mass, not a few puny planets. **** > > ** ** > > Yet all of this does seem to fit into a hypothesis about gravitational > polarization of the quantum vacuum which is by nature catalytic in the same > way that a small magnet will align a large piece of iron.**** > > ** ** > > http://phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html**** > > ** ** > > … but, catch-22, and you may have noticed that if dark matter does not > “really” exist but the phenomena attributed to dark matter are more easily > explained by the gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum, then we > simply call this effect “dark energy” instead J**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ChemE Stewart **** > > ** ** > > Agreed, physicists are just a little slow...**** > > ** ** > > http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/05/04/caught-in-the-quantum-crossfire/**** > > ** ** > > Terry Blanton wrote:**** > > https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/f61d3edfee30**** > > ** ** >
