Not that I think that gas motion is missing, in fact I believe that both of 
these vacuum effects coexist but obviously at different scales with a strong 
possibility that random gas motion is locally unchanged by the less local CE 
and DCE. Where just gas motion or just CE would be expected to reach 
equilibrium / COE where gas atoms simply move back and forth to average out to 
zero gain.  I believe the geometry and quantum effects allow the normally 
chaotic motions to be organized into an exploitable force where the random 
motion opposes the change in Casimir force [DCE] and allows HUP to  act like 
the hammer against which the now moving anvil that is DCE strikes in this 
confined space. IMHO zero point is the energy source for whatever theory you 
like, disassociating molecules, lowering the coulomb barrier, Lamb pinch or 
what ever. The DCE is of course needs a resonance but can be powered by many of 
the mechanism described in this forum like plasmons, lasers , audio, piezo and 
combinations thereof alternately opposing random motion to greater and lesser 
extents and if my pet theory is correct to a greater and lesser extend based on 
atomic or molecular state of the gas. In this pet theory the energy gain is 
realized by discounting the disassociation threshold lower than the thermal 
gain when the molecule immediately reforms..runaway. Other theories realize 
gain in different manners but I suspect the underlying energy they are 
exploiting is still this normally unexploitable force responsible for gas 
motion..HUP.
Fran

_____________________________________________
From: Frank roarty [mailto:fr...@roarty.biz]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them


Agreed "it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this 
nickel powder in the ~50 nm range" and easy to imagine these microtubules 
become interlaced when packed into bulk form and resonate through a range of 
nano geometries. Without even moving the hydrogen is already exposed to dynamic 
values of Casimir force.
Fran

_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them


-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Lowe

  Question: How do you create phonons in a lattice and be able to adjust and 
measure their frequency to get the results suggested by the theory?

Brad - IMO the precise way you have stated this question makes it unlikely 
(i.e. adjusting the lattice frequency), but claimed results may have been 
accomplished in another way.

The trick that Rossi apparently uses is somewhat the inverse of this, and could 
be called serendipity. Intentionally or not, Rossi has used a ceramic 
(SiC)containment structure for the Hot Cat which is semi-coherent in the IR at 
a certain important temperature (very sharp peak). Rossi may not have known of 
the incredibly steep peak of reflectance for SiC at 10-11 microns, leading to 
superradiance - but he was fortunate to be in a particular Italian Lab (with 
Focardi) where SiC is routinely used, so it was available. The result is the 
HotCat.

The optical photons and lattice phonons are locked, and emitted at the same 
semi-coherent frequency. It is laser-like optical emission, not pure coherence 
but superradiant.

IOW the enclosure material of the HotCat itself is superradiant at the desired 
frequency of ~27-28 THz which is 10-11 micron photon wavelength. This photon 
has a mass energy of .113 eV which is the temperature equivalent to 1038 C. 
Many theorists (Hagelstein et al) have noticed this far IR range of activity 
seems to be semi-coherent and related to gain.

Conclusion: The natural IR resonance of SiC happens to be intrinsic to the gain 
of the Rossi Hot Cat, due to its inherent properties at a specific wavelength 
(no need for adjustment)- and gain is achieved by surface plasmon absorption of 
semi-coherent IR irradiation in a positive feedback loop.

If Frank Z's MHz-meter hypothesis is involved in Rossi's device, then one would 
need to show nanometer particulate. Rossi says many times that his nickel is 10 
micron obtained from http://www.gerlimetalli.it/inglese/ihome.htm

However, it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this 
nickel powder in the ~50 nm range which Frank Z has claimed is active for Pd-D 
cold fusion.

Once again, however, the evidence seems to show that Pd-D (which may be far 
more relevant to MHz-meter) is a different reaction entirely than is Ni-H. The 
two cannot easily be rationalized as being the part of a single modus operandi.

Jones





Reply via email to