Would you want this system to be subject to the same scrutiny as LENR? That might result in the delay of its scientific acceptance and the awarding of a Nobel Prize. :)
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> To: Vortex List <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Oct 22, 2013 4:24 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Thanks to Mark Gibbs If it is measured precisely it is a scientific evidence ! 1.0047 +-0.0001 is an evidence.. is it? but did they check - the power meter - the thermometer - the IRcam - the steam quality - the steam exit - is it reproduced by more than 100 teams on the planet ? - an independent team who never worked on hot fusion, not get money from someone having supported hotfusion, nor worked in a lab workin on hotfusion if no... it is a fraud, a conspiracy of fringe researchers, delusion, unreal,... if it is proven, it is necessarily a mistake if it is precise, errors is badly estimated if there is no doubt, it is thus a fraud if a third party says it works, they are part of a fraud. if it is a big corp, it is a fraud for money sorry... I just received a phone call from MIT... they just say that since it is officially true science, I can accept it without checking... so ok, it works. 2013/10/22 Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> You have to account for the losses in the system overall. I think each firing has 20MW, but only 8KJ is "recovered", so It's a COP of less than one thousandth. 2013/10/21 Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> From: "Mark Gibbs" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 8:29:21 AM > Thanks, very kind of you to say so. Good to see you back in the vortex! Of course the "amount of energy released through the fusion reaction exceeded the amount of energy being absorbed by the fuel" is a bit hidden in the total power of the system. Let's see --- Total input = 1.7 MJ Additional Output = 8000 J COP = 1,700,000 + 8000 / 1,7000,000 = 1.0047 -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
