I don’t understand all of it yet… but
Electrons and light are the same thing. They both emerge out of the unique quantum nature of the vacuum. There are quantum rules; Wen calls them dancing rules that can connect light strings together and eliminate electrons or brake light strings apart to create electrons. In a device that Wen wants to build that looks just like a Ni/H reactor, you can create artificial light, charge, and particles derived from dipole motion. http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0210040v5.pdf *Artificial light and quantum order in systems of screened dipoles* At the end of the paper Wen says: We know that the SU(N)-spin model that realize 3D artificial light, artificial electron and artificial proton[13] is not realistic. The dipole systems discussed here contain only artificial light. It would be very interesting to design a realistic device that has artificial light, artificial electron and artificial proton. In that case, we can have an artificial world sitting on our palm. Wen does not yet know that the device; and artificial world, he wants to play with has been built in the form of the Ni/H reactor. We need to get him a Ni/H reactor to do some research on. His informed opinion might make LENR more scientific. On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: "Axil Axil" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:58:10 AM > > String-net liquid > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String-net_liquid > > > > In this theory, electrons are breaks in strings of light. > > My (very limited) understanding is that light is a maxwell-like transverse > vibration in the liquid of strings and that the ends of broken strings are > electrons. > If the strings are closed, then you get photons only, with no electrons. > >
