Bad advice. Tuna don't do numbers any better than chickens<http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/chickens-out-perform-toddlers-math-tests.html> .
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:39 AM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > We need to ask the Tuna > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Speaking of which, what would actually happen if they just dumped all the >> waste into the ocean? I mean what do the _numbers_ look like? The ocean >> is _very_ big. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:19 AM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Right, >>> >>> But they still need water. Good thing they had an ocean close by to >>> hide their sins. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "So, if the reactors had not been running there would be no disaster" >>>>> >>>>> "Idle", loaded reactors, and spent fuel pools still require continuous >>>>> cooling water. >>>>> >>>> >>>> There was no disaster in the fourth reactor. Therefore, the cooling >>>> capacity was sufficient, even though it was greatly reduced. (Some of the >>>> emergency cooling systems survived the tsunami.) The cooling pool needs >>>> much less cooling capacity than a reactor core right after a SCRAM. >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
