A 6-month test is getting into Underwriters Laboratory territory. As Rossi says: "different purposes"
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > A 6-month test is ridiculous. It does not prove anything that a 1-month > test would not prove. A week would probably suffice. > > - Jed > >
