In M Theory, stings have tension, or stiffness, which agrees with the above. Lots of energy curled up in those strings. Closed strings are gravitational and pull at space. I think they are decaying above our heads in a phenomenon we call the weather.
After plotting 10 months of sinkholes, waterspouts. seismic activity, algae and fish kills, which has been very boring, I have a hunch that our high powered, low frequency pulsed Doppler/military radars (0.25 - 3 megawatts ea.) are adding energy to the vacuum component of our atmosphere in the jet streams overhead causing increased decoherence and break down (the capacitors are discharging the extra energy to Earth), leading to increased ionized plasma discharges around the perimeter of the towers and more/larger sinkholes, storms and Earthquakes. Oklahoma City has at least 6 or 7 Doppler radars installed now (some for research at the NWS) and have had non-stop seismic activity for the past couple of years and increased mesovortex events, which are really just a discharge of weakly ionizing plasma/vacuum energy from the atmosphere in my model, which agrees with this research http://epsppd.epfl.ch/London/pdf/P4_062.pdf I think our Dopplers are charging up the overhead atmospheric capacitor leading to increased ionization of all of us that live underneath them as the atmosphere discharges that extra energy, aging us all at an increased rate. Since the 1980's, the US has installed 100 to 200 megawatts of Doppler radar weather towers and at the same time there has been a large increase in Autism, algae blooms, bleached reefs, melanomas, breast/prostate cancer, bees disappearing, bats disappearing, amphibians disappearing and starfish dissolving. I do not believe that it is global warming causing all of this Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://news.sciencemag.org/2001/06/magnetism-stiffens-space-time > > Magnetism Stiffens Space-Time > > Strong magnetic fields can break down the vacuum, to result in the > creation of p mesons. > > > > > http://homepages.uni-regensburg.de/~eng14891/qcdB_workshop/pdf/QCDB_Callebaut.pdf > > Holographic study of magnetically induced p meson condensation > > QCD in strong magnetic Fields > > In the last slide > > Conclusion: back to objectives > > > > Studied e_ect: p meson condensation > > > > phenomenological models: Bc = m2 > > > > *p *= 0.6 GeV2 > > > > lattice simulation: slightly higher value of Bc _ 0.9 GeV2 > > > > holographic approach: > > > > can the p meson condensation be modeled? Yes > > > > can this approach deliver new insights? e.g. taking into account > > constituents, e_ect on Bc > > > > Up and down quark constituents of the *p *meson can be modeled as > > separate branes, each responding to the magnetic Field by changing > > their embedding. This is a modeling of the chiral magnetic catalysis > > e_ect. We take this into account and find also a string e_ect on the > > mass, leading to a *B**crit _ 0.78 GeV2* > > > > > > > > In simple terms, if the magnetic field is strong enough, the vacuum breaks > down and p mesons start to condence into existence from the vacuum. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From time to time, evidence pops up regarding the "easier way" to solve >> the >> Global Energy Crisis and peak oil. "Easier" ... being in reference to LENR >> and the possibility that LENR may not be robust enough over an extended >> time >> frame to save us from catastrophe. >> >> That easier route would be through magnetic and gravitational interaction >> (as opposed to nuclear thermodynamics) and particularly through the Dirac >> negative energy predictions. >> >> It is fairly clear to all but a few die-hard inventors that >> electromagnetics >> alone, or gravitation alone, can provide no net energy gain. However, the >> two are connected in theory through "electrogravity," which is on solid >> footing. This does not guarantee a "crack in the door" of CoE, but at >> least >> it provides a theoretical footing for locating where the two interact in >> ways which fall outside of normal expectation. >> >> In a prior post - the work of Jerry Bayles has been mentioned. He has >> long >> promoted a version of "electrogravity" as the best route for net gain, but >> AFAIK does not have a working device, only a few tantalizing clues ... one >> of which is called "wobbulation". Here is a video where Bayles attempts to >> explain where gain will be seen via electrogravity via an out-of-phase >> wobble. >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnSAfL7z7go >> >> Note the distinction between "free energy" and "overunity". To take this >> to >> the next step, magnet rotation can be simulated in a stationary circuit >> and >> nanoparticles can possess the wobble feature at such a large relative >> excursion (while appearing stationary) that the device could appear to >> have >> a "solid state wobble". >> >> That would makes things interesting in the context of nano-magnetics. >> There >> is also cogging torque, closely related - which has been considered an >> undesirable component for electrical motors but in which there is an >> arguable "free energy component". A number of devices have been claimed to >> benefit from cogging (google Raoul Hatem). Note that most ferrite magnets >> are "pressed" from powder resulting in porosity of up to 10%. The porosity >> is not necessarily "nano" but further processing can make it nano. In some >> ways, nano-porosity may be more valuable and easier to come by than >> nanoparticulate. >> >> Dr. Kirk McDonald from Princeton has written a number of papers on >> "momentum" associated with magnetic fields. This is a variant of a famous >> problem by Shockley that introduced the concept of "hidden mechanical >> momentum." If true, hidden momentum offers the proverbial "crack in the >> wall" of CoE ... but McDonald would like to quash that notion. I'm not >> sure >> he succeeded. >> http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~kirkmcd/examples/abraham.pdf >> http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/mansuripur.pdf >> >> In the end, McDonald says that the putative energy is "elastic potential >> energy" same as is found in a stretched spring - and should not be called >> hidden mechanical momentum, despite what the others say - so the $64 >> question is can elastic potential energy, or anything similar, be used to >> produce anomalous gain in electrogravity, even in 4-space? >> >> Of course, Kirk goes on record in the negative: "Can we identify a >> "hidden" >> mechanical energy which is time component of a hidden 4-energy/momentum >> vector whose spatial components are hidden mechanical momentum 3-vector? >> The >> answer is NO..." END of McDonald quote. >> >> But from there on, we must note that it is "impossible to prove a >> negative" >> and little consideration is given to evidence of local time distortion, or >> other ways that 4-space can be harnessed, which would be expected in the >> case on a bona fide energy anomaly. So let us state emphatically that >> McDonald has not disproved what he may wish to imagine that he has. >> >> NASA has documented a distortion of time around earth, consistent with SR >> - >> but the version which would present more dramatic local time distortion, >> leading to local gain (or loss) - in a earthly device - awaits the >> persistent and creative inventor ... doubters notwithstanding. >> >> Jones >> >> >> >
