It is maybe a paper tiger, but politician, investor, administrators, are afraid by paper tigers, stamped with the seal of "consensus science".
There is a 3rd report of decision makers stoppin relation with LENR innovator, after some enthusiasm. each time "scientific advisors" seems to have "advised". 2013/11/20 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > It would seem that in the real science community, opposition is a bit of a > paper tiger. > > Didn't Jones go out of his way to fight recent funding for experiments at > MIT? > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I do not know of any prominent, published skeptics who have observed >> positive experiments. >> >> Steve Jones did experiments, as you noted, but they did not work. >> Kamikande was a good example. Richard Garwin often attacks cold fusion in >> public, but when he visited SRI and saw a positive experiment, he agreed it >> was working in a report he wrote. Nate Hoffman measured helium and agreed >> it was real. He wrote a book in which he did not mention excess heat >> results and he claimed that the tritium comes from used CANDU reactor >> moderator water. He was egged on by people at EPRI who oppose cold fusion. >> >> The other prominent skeptics have never seen an experiment as far as I >> know. Most of them have not read any papers and they know nothing about the >> research. You can see that from their comments, and in the Wikipedia >> article. >> >> A few of them did read papers. Huizenga and Morrison read papers and >> attended conferences. Britz has read more papers than anyone other than >> Storms. There may be a few others, but I don't recall any names. >> >> There are not many people actively opposed to cold fusion. There is >> inchoate opposition in the general population and among scientists. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
