I have begun to wonder whether the internet can be hindering the
process. There is a feeling that we dont need to learn stuff because
it is all there on the internet. However I wonder whether the creative
process can only really happen when we get the stuff inside our heads so
that our subconcious can get to work on it and combine it together in
new and surprising ways (You can access the internet when you are
dreaming, or at least not yet). That means good old fashioned learning
things is still nedeed as a 'hard-work' precursor to creativity.
Nigel
On 20/11/2013 09:33, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Interesting article on Science evolution...
It resonate with many things (out of LENR) I've noticed recently...
Mostly Science is dying of conformism... consensus...
It always have bee conformist, killing dissenters, but today this
conformism is getting industrialized, administered, funded, ,
globalized, mediatized, with method and rationality.
http://backreaction.blogspot.fr/2013/11/does-modern-science-discourage.html#1384868525427
the comments are interesting...
the most funny is that answer:
"Phillip Helbig
<http://www.blogger.com/profile/12067585245603436809>said...
/"But if it wouldn't work, what all these publications are about?"/
One can study theology at university, but I don't see this as a
proof of God's existence.
There is no confirmation of the Pons and Fleischmann result
published in a serious journal.
Even if your conspiracy theory is true and the establishment
boycotts cold fusion, why not just set up a power company and sell
the energy? Because it doesn't work.
8:42 AM, November 19, 2013
<http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2013/11/does-modern-science-discourage.html?showComment=1384868525427#c4613352858150026705>"
