Again IMHO this is relativistic and the orbital scale below ground state appears unchanged from the orbitals own local perspective, The quantum effect of the conductive boundaries on the vacuum density means the electron is displaced on what from our perspective is the time axis, that is to say the orbital is undergoing Lorentzian contraction but unlike the normal perspective of a stationary observer seeing only 1 axis of contraction in the direction of travel of a near luminal object our perspective is reversed. We in this case are NOT stationary relative to the hydrino, what we consider the 4d zero point of 0,0,0,0 wrongly assumes 0 time as a baseline. Just as time slows in a deep gravity well it accelerates in a high gravity hill, or warp. Just as a gravity well or near C velocity can be visualized by the Haisch Rhueda analogy of a car racing through a rainstorm and the effect of the cars velocity on the pressure of raindrops on the windshield, you can visualize the gravity hill or warp as reducing the amount of rain. Unlike normal Lorentzian contraction this is independent of velocity on any spatial vector so the orbital shrinks symmetrically on all spatial axii from our perspective - This all goes back to my relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect.. larger virtual particles aka longer vacuum wavelengths are forced to rotate onto the time axis in order to still exist between the nano boundaries of Mill's skeletal catalyst. Any hydrogen atoms migrating through this confined space shrink from our perspective and exist at a much "faster" time rate. the raindrops in the Haisch Rhueda analogy are greatly reduced and from the local perspective of the hydrino we in the macro world slow down in the same way we would perceive the Paradox twin slow down when accelerated near C. I am positing that a gravity hill relative to 0,0,0,0 is equivalent to 0,0,0,0 relative to a near luminal object or an object in a very deep gravity well and is responsible for these states we refer to as hydrino, IRH, and fractional hydrogen .
Fran From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 2:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:The speculated diameter of Mill's hydrinos is questioned here I'm carrying over the discussion of a previous subject thread where I forgot to actually place something in the subject thread. My bad. Regarding the fractional states of Mills' hydrinos. As I had recently posted, I have per formed countless computer simulations of orbital mechanics on the macro-Newtonian scale thanks to the convenience of using Visual Studio Express and a lot of programming in vb.net and c#. Earlier this year I (RE)discovered, all within the isolation of my own lonesomeness I might add, an already documented fact, that orbital periods that remain constant will all possess the exact same length in the major axis regardless of the eccentricity of the orbit. See: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg87355.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg87364.html This includes a perfect circular orbit (eccentricity of 0) where the diameter is equal to the length of the major axis. Curiously enough, this characteristic also applies to an orbital period where there is zero angular momentum (Eccentricity of 1), where the satellite drops straight to the center of the attractor. It takes a little more imagination to visual how that might be, but it IS so. I can't help but wonder if there might exist a similar form of physics happening on the quantum/wave scale, specifically pertaining to the orbital shells of electrons like the hydrogen atom. If there do exist certain similarities that carry over from the macro-Newtonian scale, and of course that is a big "IF", it would suggest, at least to me, certain unique characteristics that might not be immediately obvious to many pertaining to the basic characteristics of the orbital shell. Such as: The diameter (or major axis) of the orbital shell would essentially remains the same even while it releases energy in the form of quantum packets. Each time a quanta of energy is released what might actually be happening is that as the electron's orbital shell is simply becoming more eccentric in its over-all shape. Meanwhile, and this is the subtle point: The orbital period of the electron remains the same. It would suggest to me that on the quantum scale while the diameter of electron shell will remain the same overall size, the probability of WHERE the electron is more likely to be found is going to change dramatically as it releases energy. The probability of where the electron is more likely to be found could turn out to be a real brain teaser. For example, on the Neutonian scale, as the eccentricity of the orbiting satellite approaches 1, the probability of where the satellite is more likely to be found will be at the maximum distance, the aphelion. The aphelion is also where the minimum amount of angular momentum will be detected. The exact reverse of these two characteristics happens at the perihelion. But now, when trying to morph these classical-like Newtonian characteristics into the realm of quantum mechanics pertaining to a basic hydrogen atom's electron shell and well, dang! It's a bit confusing, at least to me, figuring out what might actually be happening! Continuing to speculate out-loud here, it's possible Mill's highly controversial hydrinos (specifically the shape of the orbital shell of the electron) might not actually be getting smaller in their over-all diameter when allegedly releasing energy. Instead, the electron shell simply becomes more eccentric in shape while continuing to maintain the same orbital period and diameter. What I remain absolutely baffled about is how might all this affect the probability of where the electron is most likely to be found as angular momentum is released in the form of packets of energy. Again, this is just wild speculation on my part. What would the mathematicians have to say on this matter? Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
