On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:00 AM, John Franks <[email protected]> wrote:

Delusional, just lies or maybe incompetence. The onus is on you to rule out
> mistakes and other artifacts before shooting off that it's nuclear reaction
> in an otherwise chemical setup. So far, no one is listening.


The discussion of objections here would be more effective if it were
focused on the perceived flaws of specific experiments and approaches.
 There no doubt are many flaws in specific cases.  But that situation does
not establish the conclusions you're hoping to get to, because there also
appear to be experiments that have been done that do not suffer from such
flaws.  Broad generalities are of little help here.

Eric

Reply via email to