Personally I don't mind Mr. Franks making a fool of himself, but I agree that it is in violation of good ethics as it pertains to the forum rules and should be addressed by a moderator. If he raised genuine questions/concerns and was less blindly antagonistic it would be less of an issue.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:00 AM, John Franks <jf27...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's because cold fusion is rubbish.There's no data, no mechanism, it's >> inhabited by cranks with a bunker mentality. You talk lies about 100% >> repeatability and offer youtube videos as evidence, instead of proper >> conferences, attended by professionals (for and against) with questions >> from the floor to the presenters. You're just playing at science, like a >> children's tea party. >> > > Perhaps you failed to read the rules of this forum when you joined. >
