One atomic unit of magnetic field is defined for a Bohr magneton in a B
field which has the energy of 13.6 eV.

Thus 1 a.u. of magnetic field = *2.35x10^^**5 *Tesla


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> The magnetic field is atomic level. The next step in the research that the
> Ni/H reactor developers need to do is measure the magnetic fields that they
> are developing in their reactions. This can be done using sub-micron hall
> effect probes.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, John Franks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> What's the magnitutde magnetic field and how do heavy hadrons display
>> these collective properties like light leptons?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> FQHE reduces the inherent charge of fermions as a function of increasing
>>> magnetic field.
>>>
>>> The nucleus is a fermion, the protons and neutrons are fermions and so
>>> are quarks.
>>>
>>> Why should a magnetic field make a distinction in the way it
>>> reduces charge is the various types of fermions? I won't.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:59 PM, John Franks <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Is like or maybe is"
>>>>
>>>> How so? Once again, QHE or FQHE is to do with cooperative properties of
>>>> light leptons. So how does this carry over to heavy hadrons and what does
>>>> that have to do with CF?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Cold fusion is like(or maybe is) the Factional Quantum Hall
>>>>> Effect(FQHE). Science did not believe that something like the FQHE was
>>>>> possible until it was shown experimentally. Cold fusion is the FQHE moved
>>>>> over to the fermions of the fermions of the atomic nucleus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are suggesting BEC, well electrons are leptons and light, how
>>>>>> can you get heavy hadrons into one coherent state at room temperature? If
>>>>>> this is the case, has CF been observed to occur spontaneously in liquid 
>>>>>> H2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to