FWIW: Analysis of proton mass using Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal system: http://reciprocalsystem.org/PDFa/Subatomic%20Mass%20Recalculated%20(Peret,%2 0Bruce).pdf
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/secondary.htm _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 9:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Proton Mass not stable? From: Mark Iverson (about 9 months ago): This story might tie in to what Jones has been saying in a number of vortex postings. Is the radius of a proton wrong? http://phys.org/news/2013-02-textbook-radius-proton-wrong.html In answering Mark, back then, a little more detail was added to the contention that the proton, despite being a fundamental particle - is surprisingly NOT very well known, physically ! To requote Asimov: The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" ("I found it!") but rather "hmm ... that's funny ..." ... --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
