Stefan,
I have been citing that paper in blogs since 2009.. and
intriguing is an understatement.. the idea that the hydrogen loaded into a
lattice of bulk powder can be relativistic while sitting still on a lab bench
surly must be unphysical?? There is no gravity well or spatial displacement
approaching C BUT there is now suppression of vacuum density brought about by
the Ni geometry and it grows by the inverse cube of spacing between plate like
geometries in parallel which the gas atoms pass between. This means the atoms
are shifting between different gravity hills without respect for isotopy -
which is broken and segregated by Casimir geometry. Naudts has identified the
hydrino as relativistic hydrogen, the lower ground state is a matter of
relative measure or Lorentzian contraction without increasing the vacuum
density in a well or by near C velocity. In this case the isotropy in the lab
becomes the bottom of the well when compared to the suppressed density inside
the Casimir geometry.. makes me suspect we are going to find more and more
anomalous half lives of radioactive gas occurring when loaded into skeletal
cats and/or nano powders.
Fran
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Observation on a BLP (patent?) document
BLP being real or not, here is something that I find intriguing,
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193
QUOTE
The Klein-Gordon equation of the hydrogen atom has a low-lying eigenstate,
called hydrino state, with square integrable wavefunction. The corresponding
spinor solution of Dirac's equation is not square integrable. For this reason
the hydrino state has been rejected in the early days of quantum mechanics as
being unphysical. Maybe it is time to change opinion.
UNQUOTE
Can we spin on this? Note
1. Not being square integrable means probably that the wave function has
"thick tails" and that it basically describes a non-localized electron that
happens to get close very very seldom. E.g. quite an unlikely state.
2. Solutions to Klein Gordon equations is most probably a combination of spinor
states for which the thick tails cancels. This may mean that you can have a
hydrino state, but it's basically impossible to reach it because it depends on
a delicate balance.
But what if we combine a cluster of N hydrogen atoms, what happens then?, well
we could view this as a possibility to bend the space into a compact manifolds
of various forms and for applying these states on that system, one could
perhaps trigger the formation of these hydrino states, for that case one would
expect the electron will be partly bound closely, more closely than ordinary
hydrogen but also have a component of delocalisation e.g. an affinity for the
system to behave as a strongly coupled system just as with a BEQ state.
So assuming the active sites have an ability to catalyze clusters of hydrino
clusters, the next step to take is to note that for these hydrino clusters that
could very well be close in nature to BEQ clusters, but more combact due to the
close proximity of the electrons to the nucleus, the mechanism Kim describes
could very well trigger nuclear reactions.
At least that's my 2c of what's happens.
Have fun!
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Jones Beene
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In earlier BLP filings - on what constitutes a hydrino catalyst, it turned out
to be possible to fit two thirds of the periodic table into their expansive
definition. Talk about "over-reaching" ...
USPTO examiners detest these painfully long and over-reaching applications.
Many observers have commented on how poorly worded BLP's efforts turn out - and
how little value they actually have in defensible IP, having paid top dollar
for poor work. BLP will probably not fare well if it ever comes to litigation.
A few years ago it was noted here that the company had overlooked "gas phase"
in all of their voluminous filings - that is, up until Rossi's patent
application showed up in which his claim was for only gas phase... at which
time BLP altered a previous filing, once which had only claimed liquid and
plasma phase, to include gas phase. It was obvious that they were trying to
cover up a glaring mistake in coverage.
I suppose that they were hoping no one would take notice, but instead the
effect was to announce to the world how badly they had screwed up.
From: David Roberson
It appears to me that they have most of the possible current levels covered.
Why list ranges that include each other?
Magnetic fields that are changing in magnitude or direction generate electric
fields that can impart energy upon charged particles. A steady magnetic field
is not able to supply energy to these charged objects, but can change their
direction of motion.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
The BLP website is down as I write this, but yesterday the
"What's New" tab on their homepage led to this entry dated 1/14/14 -
Patent Application - Power Generation Systems and Methods Regarding Same.
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/Power%20Generation%20Systems%20and%20Methods%20Patent%20Application.pdf
I am unsure whether this untitled 324 page document is an existing
patent application, one just submitted, or is pending submission.
What I found especially interesting is that it credits the anomalous
energy generation, and hydrino formation to an extremely wide range of
plasma currents, and current pulse widths. For example, on p.107,
the following excerpt appears -
"The current density may be in the range of at least one of
100A/cm^2 to 1,000,000 A/cm^2, 1000 A/cm^2 to 100,000 A/cm^2,
[...]
The pulse time may be in at least one range chosen from about
10^-6 s to 10s, 10^-5s to 1s, 10^-4s to 0.1s, and 10^-3s to 0.01s.
[...]
The magnetic flux may be in the range of about 10 G to 10 T,
100 G to 5 T, or 1 kG to 1 T."
The huge current densities and sharp rise/fall times should create
very large magnetic forces that, if focused, impart huge momenta
and energies to charged particles that are in, or impacted, by the
plasma current filaments.
Possibly, BLP's upcoming demo will be a more systemic version of
the 1922 Wendt-Irion experiment that vindicates W-I's conclusions?
-- Lou Pagnucco
