The author of the patent has the basics right, but I wouldn’t think he could patent the process.
In Rossi type LENR, there is energy accumulation and storage going on. The LENR process involves both energy storage and its concentration to accumulate atomic levels of power. The Ni/H reactor is like a laser which stores energy in coherent absorption of photons in the lasing material. It is concentrated quantum mechanically until it is released in a short burst at high concentration levels. The Ni/H reactor stores energy in coherent dipole motion in which a condensate forms. The condensate is the energy storage and distribution medium where superfluidic energy transfer maximizes storage capacity by making such all the members of the condensate have a equal amount of energy saved away. Then like a laser the energy stored by the Ni/H reactor is released from the energy condensate in a concentrated burst like a laser pulse of light. The concentration of energy in each small packet of discharge is stellar in its magnitude and is high enough to cause a nuclear reaction. But unlike a laser, the energy from this nuclear reaction is channeled back into the condensate without loss in a positive feedback loop. If energy is not judiciously removed from the condensate, the process will increase out of control until the structure of the reactor is destroyed. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Teslaalset <[email protected]>wrote: > i found a patent application that was published on December 2013 on Least > Action Nuclear Process, claiming an alternative explanation of what most of > us see as LENR. > The inventor, Daniel S. Szumski, presented this theory during ICCF17 I > believe. > Jed posted it here at Vortex a while ago. > > Link to the patent application: > > http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2013184082A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=&date=20131212&DB=&&locale=en_EP > > Does anyone have an opinion on this process? Axil, Jed? > > >
