I have 2 years statistics in FL showing accelerated ionization and decay clustered around microwave radar towers, including algae blooms, fish kills,increased sinkholes and waterspouts. In Oklahoma and North Texas my 3 year statistics are showing a correlation between microwave radar tower locations and increased seismic, some locations include chlorinated fracking water...
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, <[email protected]> wrote: > Very interesting. Can such a device convert terahertz radiation into DC > power? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > To: vortex-l <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 10:31 am > Subject: [Vo]:MHD- from Russia with Love... > > Speaking of "intentional deception" in a patent application ... (which BTW > voids that patent application if it can be proved - and is not tolerated by > USPTO) there is the issue of MHD. > > Any patent or claim that proposes to convert heat into electricity based on > MHD is probably nothing but hot air, unless... they have benefitted from the > Russian connection (to be explained). It has been a dozen years since this > first came up, but now, it is all starting to makes sense. (unless, of > course, the following explanation is giving BLP more credit than they > deserve). > > Any direct conversion feature (heat into electricity) would be highly > unlikely without the Russian resource, since there is no commercially > available hardware in the USA to accomplish the task. Literally billions of > dollars were been spent over the past 50 years trying to adapt MHD > conversion to coal and natural gas as the first stage of a compound system > with steam second. NASA and DoE both failed. The technical challenges are > overwhelming. > > In fact, the only place where commercial MHD was placed into actual service > was Russia. Japan may have licensed the tech from Russia. This comes to mind > now, since there was indeed a type of direct conversion device which is > similar to MHD and was the primary part of an earlier BLP effort known the > "reverse gyrotron". > > To become an informed observer on this demo next week, one can best > understand the present situation with bit of history - and with an > appreciation of "Cuccia coupling". (short summary: Cuccia coupling is the > only known way to convert UV, which is where the hydrino energy originates, > into electron acceleration and it is done via microwave as the coupling > agent). Once UV is absorbed, the hot electrons are separated by vector > alteration and collected on an electrode, just as if we were dealing with a > high powered triode. > > OK - This device may not be part of the upcoming demo, since Mills has > lowered expectations to almost zero - but to my thinking in the historical > context, it would be the one detail which would not only make this demo into > something extremely important, but also clarify what is going on. An > associate who followed BLP closely before he died - related that years ago > (circa 2002) when Mills failed to adapt a gyrotron successfully in his first > version, the Russian group below contacted BLP with a working model of a > device that could do it, but Mills' ego was such that he rebuffed them. > Perhaps he had a change of heart - and now, a decade later - we see the > results. > > I see one of the Russian papers is still up. Pictures of the working model > gyrotron are shown. Maybe BLP came to its senses and is now working with > whatever capitalist company in the "New Russia" took over this technology. > Or maybe BLP was waiting on their patent to expire, who knows? > http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/sep99/1/text.html > > It is possible that Mills has adapted a Russian gyrotron device to do this. > Otherwise, the chances that a home-grown MHD system is being used for direct > conversion seem slim-to-none, due to the extreme technical challenge. Even > Mills does not have the financial resource for that. > > Jones > > > > >
