Have you considered setting up a sage calculation sheet on a webserver with formulas and equations easy verifiable in the sheet, that would be impressive way to show that the math works and could be a nice companion to the actual textbook.
/Stefan On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jeff Driscoll <jef...@gmail.com> wrote: > have you looked at my website? > I describe many details of Mills's theory: > > http://zhydrogen.com/ > > Jeff > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom physics, I am >> pretty amazed. >> >> Folks, his theory is really accurate, and we should not dismiss it just >> because of the hydrino prediction. He actually calculates the g factor to >> the same level as QED, but he indicates it took two decades of fiddling >> with the QED equations to reach that level of accuracy. So the Math is as >> right as what we can get by using ordinary QED/QM but Mill's math is much >> more elegant. >> >> One hydrino state is predicted by QED too, but the spinnors are not >> integrable in QED although >> probably by combining them lead to an acceptable solution. Also the other >> states may as well be there but it's probably hard to find them because of >> the convoluted math. Also we should expect that these hydrino states have >> as well non integrable spinors. The interesting thing to understand now is >> what paths the QM/Mill's theory allow to go from a normal state to a >> hydrino state. In a sense it is degenerate and it looks like these states >> are locked. In a sense atoms must interact strongly e.g. get really close >> together and act in a precise way in order to mediate >> the forming of a hydrino. It is not unlikly that the conditions are very >> special and rarely happens in normal physics/chemistry. >> >> In a sense it's crazy how people treat his work all over the intertubes. >> They say that his results are wacko. It could be that the math is correct >> but there is a some extra conditions for the solutions to be physical, that >> is missing that relates to the integrability conditions for the spinors. >> >> Also if there any serious issues with his math I would like to know, else >> he deserves respect, with or without the hydrino. >> >> /Stefan >> > > > > -- > Jeff Driscoll > 617-290-1998 >
